Model database

Every published prediction model identified by the systematic review. Click a row for full extraction details, PROBAST domains, and a plain-language summary.

Outcome Predicted

Modelling Method

Year

Country

External validation

Calibration reported

Public model

PROBAST Risk of Bias

Showing 9 of 54 models

					Modelling Method				Publicly available
Hildrew et al.	2024	USA	Stereotactic Radiosurgery	Hearing Function	Cox Regression	109	C-index 0.662	High risk of bias	No
Bossi Zanetti et al.	2023	Italy	Stereotactic Radiosurgery	Tumour Growth	ANN / Deep Learning	108	—	High risk of bias	No
George Jones et al.	2021	USA	Stereotactic Radiosurgery	Tumour Growth	SVM	53	AUC 0.750	High risk of bias	No
Shi et al.	2021	China	Stereotactic Radiosurgery	Recurrence / Regrowth	Cox Regression	67	AUC 0.889	High risk of bias	Yes
Yang et al.	2021	China	Stereotactic Radiosurgery	Regression vs Non-Response vs Pseudoprogression	SVM	336	AUC 0.923	High risk of bias	No
Langenhuizen et al.	2020	The Netherlands	Stereotactic Radiosurgery	Tumour Enlargement	SVM	99	AUC 0.900	High risk of bias	No
Langenhuizen et al.	2020	The Netherlands	Stereotactic Radiosurgery	Tumour Control	SVM	83	AUC 0.930	High risk of bias	No
Senova et al.	2016	France	Stereotactic Radiosurgery	Trigeminal Neuropathy	Logistic Regression	179	AUC 0.890	High risk of bias	Yes
Meeks et al.	2000	USA	Stereotactic Radiosurgery	Facial or Trigeminal Neuropathy	Other	118	—	High risk of bias	No